09-15-2012 at 1:23 PM

Unless we separate Themed Shows from Non Themed shows.<br /> <br /> And non upgraded member would be allowed 1 themed show and one non.<br /> Upgrades would be able to make 2 of each.

09-15-2012 at 1:20 PM

Supporrtt

09-15-2012 at 1:18 PM

Support support support

02-13-2012 at 7:44 AM

I support this only if you get no money when you choose that no one wins. That way you can't just create a Beauty show, have people pay to enter, and be mean and not let anyone win and still get money. <br /> <br /> A lot of Beauty shows have dogs that don't even fit the name, it would be nice to not have to choose a winner that doesn't match what you wanted to judge. <br /> <br />

09-26-2011 at 6:08 PM

I support though I also like Nelly's idea. you still pay to enter beauty shows. however I am tired of seeing people enter beauty shows and not meet the set requirements

09-23-2011 at 3:44 PM

I agree with "No Winner". Runner up is just kinda pointless in my opinion. Either you win or your don't. End of story.

09-23-2011 at 12:41 PM

Support No Winner.<br /><br /><br />I've had my themes fail so many times, such as contests for "natural blue (no glitch)" being full of only glitched dogs with every color imaginable. :1

09-23-2011 at 10:22 AM

support both

08-5-2011 at 4:51 PM

Support.

08-4-2011 at 9:40 PM

Support both!

08-4-2011 at 3:19 AM

Support. Runner up? That's pretty much the same thing as a first place. I'd like this with-out a runner up option.

08-4-2011 at 1:31 AM

I support with the runner up idea...but the runner up should get $150 or $200. Just not on the winner page.

08-3-2011 at 9:21 PM

I agree both with no winner and runner up. But runners up don't get a money prize or on the random winner page.

08-3-2011 at 9:19 PM

I support this totally. But on the other hand, I would also kind of like to have a "Runner Up" Option, since in some of my contests I am finding myself having to do Eenie Meenie to pick a winner XP